![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhtUwynxbfdxacP7h5OvrbgkpgvG9WSP325Unx2pWImCneKJTtsAMS70ASMnigc_7_vbwZOT7AfzSIKLu5OokZiULMcmruJJRWuwTsV-80JFYGVZWimLSkoiA6fyHVycN6856p2xvjvHuo/s400/Sagrada+Familia.jpg)
This building sparked a really interesting discussion about whether the building is art or architecture or sculpture or what? I think my opinion may have changed a bit as a cause of this. While I'm a Gaudi fan, I can't say that was is currently built should be considered architecture: It doesn't seem to be carrying out its intended purpose/function, which is the point of good architecture. It should also be for the use of people, and presently it is not being used except as a tour site in order to raise money to continue construction. Which really just brings me back in a circle, because it can't be finished to meet the intended use without being an object until money can be found to complete it...*sigh.*